888 X 動態摘要｜06/08
生成時間: 2026-06-08 06:25:48
總結
新型GLP-1雙受體激動劑展現顯著減重潛力，預示製藥市場新一輪競爭。
今日重點
1. 新型GLP-1藥物突破
- 人物: Eric Topol (頂尖心臟病專家)
- 時間: 3h
- 熱度: 👀 29,648
- 觀察: Survodutide作為GLP-1與升糖素雙受體激動劑，實現約16%體重減輕。
- 意義: 揭示減重藥物市場潛在增長點與技術創新方向，值得密切關注。
2. 雙受體減重藥物競爭
- 人物: Eric Topol (頂尖心臟病專家)
- 時間: 3h
- 熱度: 👀 15,267
- 觀察: 另一款GLP-1與升糖素雙受體激動劑Mazdutide，亦表現出類似體重減輕效果。
- 意義: 強化GLP-1類藥物市場競爭格局，預示未來製藥板塊的投資機遇。
原始動態
其他 | Elon Musk
- 時間: 4h
- 熱度: 👀 371,672
- 原文: When statistically impossible things happen, we should not be expected as a society to accept them. Evidence of fraud isn’t limited to video surveillance. Statistical impossibilities are hard evidence of fraud.
其他 | Nassim Taleb
- 時間: 6h
- 熱度: 👀 116,860
- 原文: A terrorist carried out a horrific shooting spree targeting civilians in central Israel today, murdering one Israeli and wounding several others. We stand firmly with against these acts of terror. My deepest condolences to the victims’ families and all those affected.
重點 | Eric Topol
- 時間: 3h
- 熱度: 👀 29,648
- 原文: The tide is coming in. High tide of the X-tides, that is in the new GLP-1 family of peptide drugs. Today survodutide, a GLP-1 and glucagon dual receptor agonist (no GIP, like tirzepatide) drug that achieved ~16% body weight loss at 2 different doses cf placebo
其他 | Elon Musk
- 時間: 12m
- 熱度: 👀 332,016
- 原文: 💯
其他 | Nassim Taleb
- 時間: 53m
- 熱度: 👀 17,986
- 原文: Those who claim their enemies understand only the language of force understand only the language of force.
重點 | Eric Topol
- 時間: 3h
- 熱度: 👀 15,267
- 原文: And today Mazdutide, also a GLP-1 and glucagon dual receptor agonist with similar body weight loss as Survodutide
其他 | Eric Topol
- 時間: 2h
- 熱度: 👀 4,540
- 原文: Evidence for hydration to prevent kidney stones, from a randomized trial?
其他 | Pierre Levy
- 時間: 38m
- 熱度: 👀 1,403
- 原文: Not quite true. GenX was just to confused to notice it and the boomers were too polite to mention it
其他 | Pierre Levy
- 時間: 43m
- 熱度: 👀 1,080
- 原文: The US is a nation of cheaters. How can you be fit for public office unless you can deal with a certain degree of cheating in the election process?